What actually moves the needle on retention? Our 2026 Student Impact Report has the numbers. Read the report
Platform Solutions All features Pricing Research 2026 Impact Report Blog Customer stories About Careers FAQs Sign in Book a demo
Student success analytics

Equip every team to improve any student outcome.

EduPlatter unifies your student data, fits models to your institution rather than a sector average, and turns each insight into an outreach someone owns. Since 2018, from New Delhi.

Institution-specific models SIS, LMS, CRM and attendance in one place Efficacy testing every term

Pricing negotiated per institution · no per-seat surprises

Advising queue · Autumn 2026 institution model
+4.1ptTerm-to-term persistence
1,284Students flagged for outreach
62%Outreach closed this week
AKA. Kulkarni · BSc Sem 3 · 2 missed assessmentsact now
RMR. Menon · BCom Sem 5 · fee hold, LMS dropact now
SDS. Das · BA Sem 1 · attendance dipwatch
PNP. Nair · BTech Sem 7 · on planon track
WHY top factor · assessment gap in gateway course

Product preview with illustrative data. Names and figures are simulated.

500+colleges and universities served
100M+student data points processed
15+countries with active deployments
6research papers published with method and data
Trusted by institutions of every size

From single-campus colleges to multi-campus university systems, in India and beyond.

University of Delhi
IIT System
BITS Pilani
Amity University
Manipal Academy
Christ University
The problem

Does your institution have a student impact gap?

These are the six failures we hear about most. They make it hard to act on what works, they slow progress against institutional goals, and they leave too many students behind.

Disconnected systems

The SIS knows one thing, the LMS another, and the CRM a third. Nobody has the whole student.

Fragmented data

Six spreadsheets, four definitions of “retention”, and a term-end reconciliation nobody enjoys.

Unclear insight

A dashboard that reports what happened, but not who to call on Monday morning or why.

Low engagement

Students who need help the most are the least likely to walk into an office and ask for it.

Overwhelmed staff

An advisor with 400 assigned students cannot prioritise by intuition, however good it is.

Siloed departments

Academics, enrolment and student services each run an intervention. None of them knows about the others.

How it works

Three steps to close the gap.

Nothing here is magic, and none of it works without the first step. Most failed analytics projects fail at data, not at modelling.

Unify your data

We consolidate SIS, LMS, CRM, attendance, assessment and fee systems into one warehouse with one agreed definition of every term. Typically six to ten weeks.

Surface what works

Models are fitted to your institution, not borrowed from a sector benchmark. Each prediction names the factors behind it so it can be argued with.

Act, then measure

Outreach is assigned, tracked and closed. Next term we test whether it worked using matched comparison, and tell you if it did not.

The Student Impact Platform

One platform, three audiences, one source of truth.

Leaders need to know which programmes work. Advisors need to know who to call today. Students need to know where they stand. The same data serves all three, with different views and different permissions.

Who uses it
Leadership & provostsAdvisors & facultyStudentsInstitutional research
Analytics & workflow layer
Institution-specific modelsEfficacy testingOutreach queuesShared case notes
Your data, unified
SISLMSCRMAttendanceAssessmentFees & holdsCard swipe
Capabilities

What you can do with EduPlatter.

Five things institutions use the platform for. Pick the one that sounds like your problem.

Connect data and systems

Bring SIS, LMS, CRM, attendance, assessment, fee and card data into one warehouse with one agreed definition of every term. The integration is our work, not a project you staff for six months.

  • Connectors for the systems Indian and international institutions actually run
  • One data dictionary, versioned, so “persistence” means one thing across departments
  • Nightly refresh as standard; near-real-time for attendance and LMS events
Explore the platform
Advising queue · Autumn 2026 institution model
+4.1ptTerm-to-term persistence
1,284Students flagged for outreach
62%Outreach closed this week
AKA. Kulkarni · BSc Sem 3 · 2 missed assessmentsact now
RMR. Menon · BCom Sem 5 · fee hold, LMS dropact now
SDS. Das · BA Sem 1 · attendance dipwatch
PNP. Nair · BTech Sem 7 · on planon track
WHY top factor · assessment gap in gateway course

Surface what is actually working

Institution-specific models rather than sector averages. We fit on your students, your programmes and your calendar, and we report which factors are doing the work.

  • Predicted persistence and completion, with the contributing factors named
  • Course-level bottleneck analysis for on-time completion
  • Efficacy testing on interventions, using matched comparison rather than before-and-after
Explore the platform
Advising queue · Autumn 2026 institution model
+4.1ptTerm-to-term persistence
1,284Students flagged for outreach
62%Outreach closed this week
AKA. Kulkarni · BSc Sem 3 · 2 missed assessmentsact now
RMR. Menon · BCom Sem 5 · fee hold, LMS dropact now
SDS. Das · BA Sem 1 · attendance dipwatch
PNP. Nair · BTech Sem 7 · on planon track
WHY top factor · assessment gap in gateway course

Coordinate proactive support

An insight that nobody owns changes nothing. Every flagged student becomes an outreach with an assignee, a channel, a due date and a recorded outcome.

  • Shared case notes across advising, faculty and student services
  • Outreach queues prioritised by predicted impact, not alphabetically
  • Closed-loop recording so the next efficacy study has clean data
Explore the platform
Advising queue · Autumn 2026 institution model
+4.1ptTerm-to-term persistence
1,284Students flagged for outreach
62%Outreach closed this week
AKA. Kulkarni · BSc Sem 3 · 2 missed assessmentsact now
RMR. Menon · BCom Sem 5 · fee hold, LMS dropact now
SDS. Das · BA Sem 1 · attendance dipwatch
PNP. Nair · BTech Sem 7 · on planon track
WHY top factor · assessment gap in gateway course

Remove barriers to completion

Find the curricular and administrative knots that stop students finishing on time, then plan course supply against forecast demand rather than last year's timetable.

  • Course demand forecasting by programme and cohort
  • Prerequisite and sequencing bottleneck detection
  • Fee-hold and registration friction analysis
Explore the platform
Advising queue · Autumn 2026 institution model
+4.1ptTerm-to-term persistence
1,284Students flagged for outreach
62%Outreach closed this week
AKA. Kulkarni · BSc Sem 3 · 2 missed assessmentsact now
RMR. Menon · BCom Sem 5 · fee hold, LMS dropact now
SDS. Das · BA Sem 1 · attendance dipwatch
PNP. Nair · BTech Sem 7 · on planon track
WHY top factor · assessment gap in gateway course

Prove efficacy and ROI

Every programme gets an honest assessment. Our 2026 report found only about half of initiatives produce a measurable effect — knowing which half is the entire point.

  • Matched-comparison efficacy studies each term
  • Effect sizes with confidence intervals, not percentage-point anecdotes
  • Resource reallocation guidance based on measured effect per rupee
Explore the platform
Advising queue · Autumn 2026 institution model
+4.1ptTerm-to-term persistence
1,284Students flagged for outreach
62%Outreach closed this week
AKA. Kulkarni · BSc Sem 3 · 2 missed assessmentsact now
RMR. Menon · BCom Sem 5 · fee hold, LMS dropact now
SDS. Das · BA Sem 1 · attendance dipwatch
PNP. Nair · BTech Sem 7 · on planon track
WHY top factor · assessment gap in gateway course
Measured outcomes

Results that survived a control group.

Each of these was measured with matched comparison against a similar cohort, not by comparing this year to last. Institution names are withheld where our agreement requires it.

+4.1pt Term-to-term persistence Multi-campus private university · 28,000 students · 2 terms
+7.8pt On-time completion, gateway courses State-affiliated college cluster · 11,400 students · 3 terms
−31% Advisor time spent identifying who to contact Autonomous college · 6,200 students · time-and-motion study

Effect sizes and confidence intervals for all three are in DBR equivalent report EPR-2026-04. Two further deployments showed no measurable effect in the first year; we publish those too.

From partner institutions

People who had the same problem.

“We had three dashboards and no agreement about what retention meant. EduPlatter’s first deliverable was not a model — it was a data dictionary that our registrar, our deans and our IR office all signed. The analytics only started working after that.”
Dr. R. Deshpande
Dean, Academic Planning · multi-campus private university
Students28,000 across 4 campuses
Systems unifiedSIS, LMS, CRM, attendance, fees
Time to first insight9 weeks
Measured effect+4.1pt persistence over 2 terms
Advising
“My advisors carry 400 students each. The queue is the whole product for us — it tells them who to call before the student has already decided to leave.”
S. Mathew
Director, Student Success · autonomous college
Institutional research
“They told us two of our flagship programmes had no measurable effect. That was not a comfortable meeting, and it was the most useful thing a vendor has ever done for us.”
A. Narayanan
Head, Institutional Research · state-affiliated cluster

Quotes from partner institutions, shared with permission and lightly edited for length. Names abbreviated and institutions described generically where our agreements require it.

Frequently asked

Questions, answered.

How long does implementation actually take?
Six to ten weeks to a unified warehouse and first dashboards for a single-campus institution with reasonable data hygiene. Multi-campus systems with heterogeneous SIS instances take longer — three to five months is honest. Anyone promising two weeks is either not integrating your data or not validating it.
Do you sell or reuse our student data?
No. We act as a data processor under your instruction. Your data is not sold, not shared with other institutions, and not used to train models for anyone else — which is also why our models are institution-specific rather than pooled. See Security & data for the full architecture.
How much does it cost?
Pricing is negotiated with each institution, because a 2,000-student college and a 60,000-student system are not the same engagement. What drives the number is enrolment band, how many systems need integrating, and whether you want efficacy studies each term. The pricing page explains the model without pretending there is a list price.
What if the models do not work for our students?
That is a real outcome and we have published it happening. Our transfer study found a model fitted on one institution loses substantial precision elsewhere, which is why we fit on yours. If the fitted model does not beat a simple baseline on your held-out data, we tell you before you deploy anything.
How do staff and students get access?
Credentials for the Student Impact Platform are issued by your institution, not by us — we never create an account for a student or staff member directly. Sign-in runs against your own identity provider where you have one. If you need access, ask your student success or IT office.
Does this comply with Indian data protection law?
We process under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 as a data processor, with data residency in India by default. For institutions with US or EU students we also support FERPA and GDPR-aligned processing terms. Details on Security & data.

See all frequently asked questions →

Let's improve outcomes together

See what is possible at your institution.

A 40-minute call with someone who has done an integration, not a sales engineer reading a deck. We will tell you if your data is not ready.

New Delhi · team@eduplatter.com · we reply within one working day